05-19-2003, 01:41 AM
The first thing I thought of (but didn't write) when I read these stories is that they tell just one side of the story. That you got them off of the web doesn't help their case either.
Regarding the second story, why would Child Services get involved in a case involving a 22 year old? They have more than enough to do as it is -- it seems unlikely that they'd take on something so far out of their regular jurisdiction.
As far as the first story goes -- where did the charges for molestation enter into the picture? Child services asked a whole lot of questions, but we only get the kid's answer to one of them.
What I find really odd is that the poster asks the question, "If you have ever been involved with Children Services you know how well they listen." Which gives the impression that some significant portion of his audience has been involved with Child Services. So I now find myself wondering, "where the heck did Mithrandir get these posts?"
Regarding the second story, why would Child Services get involved in a case involving a 22 year old? They have more than enough to do as it is -- it seems unlikely that they'd take on something so far out of their regular jurisdiction.
As far as the first story goes -- where did the charges for molestation enter into the picture? Child services asked a whole lot of questions, but we only get the kid's answer to one of them.
What I find really odd is that the poster asks the question, "If you have ever been involved with Children Services you know how well they listen." Which gives the impression that some significant portion of his audience has been involved with Child Services. So I now find myself wondering, "where the heck did Mithrandir get these posts?"