The At Will Employment is one thing, I didn't have time to look yesterday, I'll see if I can find it today.
The O'Brien case is different. He had a contract. the termination of his employment violated the terms of the contract. Not because it violated employment laws. Like Kandrathe pointed out, the At Will Employment ideologies of Ohio would have meant he had no recourse.
The O'Brien case is different. He had a contract. the termination of his employment violated the terms of the contract. Not because it violated employment laws. Like Kandrathe pointed out, the At Will Employment ideologies of Ohio would have meant he had no recourse.
nobody ever slaughtered an entire school with a smart phone and a twitter account – they have, however, toppled governments. - Jim Wright