07-04-2013, 01:00 AM
(07-03-2013, 04:10 PM)eppie Wrote: Jester, you are behaving like you are in a pissing contest discussion. You discuss because the fun of it. You mix theory and practice when it comes convenient to you.
And if I'm not discussing this because it's fun?
Quote:Allow polygamy? That means you will also allow 73 women and 85 men to get married right? And what would that mean? I guess that would make things easy right? And would people who want to marry 458 others at the same time be interested in the law regarding marrying or just living together?
Pretty much, yes.
Quote:About your comment that a polygamous marriage has a chance to be unequal. Please phrase differently; it has a chance of being equal, but it likely isn't and without some religious conviction it is not worth fighting for.
Who on earth are you to tell me what's worth fighting for, whose rights matter and whose don't?
Quote:(and if it is; please let them go ahead....I will support those 4 girls for their specific case, but let's not let some theoretic whining allow people who think women are second class citizen to have their way.)
Do you have some reason to think this is theoretical to me?
-Jester