03-02-2005, 04:11 PM
Darian,Mar 2 2005, 10:04 AM Wrote:[snip a whole bunch]
It's not that I'm bored, I'm just trying to determine whether the perception out there really is that just because my name sits above the word "warrior" that I'm expected to fill this ONE role.
[right][snapback]69547[/snapback][/right]
And the answer is that you can play your warrior any way you please, and if someone *expects* you to play it a certain way, find a different groupmate. I've got a tank warrior. I meshed wonderfully with a 2-hand DPS warrior in an instance. We didn't have a rogue in the group (warrior, warrior, priest, mage, hunter), so he stayed in Battle Stance and took over the melee DPS role with his big nasty 2-handed axe, Overpower, and Execute, and we had a great time. The hunter's pet took over off-tank duties. I held the mobs for the other warrior to chop into chunks while the mage fried them. Lotsa dead mobs that night. :P :D
It's all about what *you want to do*. Of course, you have to be adaptable/flexible enough to fill a group's needs if you wish to be invited, but you don't have to be pigeonholed because you're a warrior, either.
--Mav