12-22-2005, 10:20 PM
Chesspiece_face,Dec 22 2005, 03:59 PM Wrote:There's been a lot of jibber jabber lately coming out lately rationalizing Bush's "Spying" by claiming that Clinton did the same thing. Just thought i would clear this up for anyone that is following the whole bruhahah.
What Clinton approved was entirely different than what has happened under Bush (whether Bush broke the law or not). This is what Clinton signed:
Full Text
The key excerpt from above is the "certifications required by that section". And if you look at what those certifications state you'll find that the only way they can enact these searches is if
Full Text 2
(this link may ask you to make a donation. just click "no thanks")
[right][snapback]97835[/snapback][/right]
Thank you. Same law being dealt with, not the same article or procedure under the law.
Occhi
Cry 'Havoc' and let slip the Men 'O War!
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete
In War, the outcome is never final. --Carl von Clausewitz--
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
John 11:35 - consider why.
In Memory of Pete