02-18-2003, 04:02 AM
as someone has already pointed out, saying france owes the US is very flawed. history can be twisted any way. it could be said that france owes russia(and should take the same stance as them) because the russians fought the germans on the oh so important second front. it could be said that the US owes france(and shouldn't be bad mouthing them) , because without some of the things the french did in the early half of the 20th century, who knows where the US would be. it could even be said that the US owes japan(and thus should be concentrating on n.korea) for getting them into ww2, and securing their place in the world. are any of these nessicarily right? no, but they are about as right as france owing the US.
i don't see how trying to hurt the economies of france and germany will help the war against terrorism, which is suposed to be the main goal of the US. who cares if every country supports the war.
i don't see how trying to hurt the economies of france and germany will help the war against terrorism, which is suposed to be the main goal of the US. who cares if every country supports the war.
DANCE TO THE TENSION OF A WORLD ON EDGE