11-22-2010, 08:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-22-2010, 08:38 PM by Concillian.)
Just need to wait a bit for word to get around on the low pop faction that WG is actually worth entering. Several months of zoning in and not able to survive more than a few seconds kinda discourages participation, and the low pop side probably has a bunch of people who haven't even thought about WG in months.
Before the queue change, Terenas horde wasn't really all that bad on the W/L ratio, was more like 4 to 1, but the wins were mostly at odd hours. It was actually one of the more balanced of the old-timer Normal ruleset servers in terms of WG win / loss ratio. Most were well worse than Terenas. There's a site somewhere that lists all the WG wins and losses and gives a ratio for the last month or so. I clicked like 20 servers at random once and only one was more balanced than Terenas. The norm was worse than 20 / 80... that was the NORM. That's why they changed it. It wasn't balanced for ANYONE.
Before the queue change, Terenas horde wasn't really all that bad on the W/L ratio, was more like 4 to 1, but the wins were mostly at odd hours. It was actually one of the more balanced of the old-timer Normal ruleset servers in terms of WG win / loss ratio. Most were well worse than Terenas. There's a site somewhere that lists all the WG wins and losses and gives a ratio for the last month or so. I clicked like 20 servers at random once and only one was more balanced than Terenas. The norm was worse than 20 / 80... that was the NORM. That's why they changed it. It wasn't balanced for ANYONE.
Conc / Concillian -- Vintage player of many games. Deadly leader of the All Pally Team (or was it Death leader?)
Terenas WoW player... while we waited for Diablo III.
And it came... and it went... and I played Hearthstone longer than Diablo III.
Terenas WoW player... while we waited for Diablo III.
And it came... and it went... and I played Hearthstone longer than Diablo III.