Lethal Injection Under Fire Again

[Chaerophon]

Griffonspade;

1.) Threaded view is your friend. You are replying to posts that I have directed towards other people as though they were pointed at you.

2.) You seem to have missed the point of my posts, even after I specifically dedicated a post to explicitly clarifying that point. In fact, you responded to that post with more of the same argument (if you can call it that).

3.) I will reiterate one last time: since you addressed my post, which was nothing more than an argument that it IS the government's role to enforce some sort of limits on child welfare in this respect (AND DID NOT ADDRESS THE QUESTION OF WHETHER OR NOT THESE LIMITS ARE PRESENTLY IMPLEMENTED APPROPRIATELY OR EFFICIENTLY), I could only assume that your anecdotal evidence regarding the poor implementation of such limits was intended to demonstrate that their structure and enforcement should be controlled by parents, and not the government.

4.) As for "contentless propaganda": given my warranted assumption that you were trying to make a point re: the role of government in enforcing limits on child welfare, your anecdotal evidence contained no useful content, and appeared to be intended to spark an emotional response as a supporting "point".

Please take the time to digest this and have a look at the course of the discussion in threaded view.