Controversial grand jury decision
#1
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/03/30/texas.ma...r.ap/index.html

This story has been all over several forums I frequent and was curious about the Lounge's feelings about it.

Cliff Notes: Husband comes home, sees wife and another guy fooling around in a truck, wife cries rape falsely, and husband kills fleeing lover.

I think it's "fairly" obvious that the wife should be charged since she intentionally created a false situation which led to the death of an innocent man, but I am mildly startled by the number of people happy that the husband got off with no penalties. The husband discharged a firearm in a residential area, endangering the residents of their neighborhood and his own wife, and couldn't be bothered to take the instant required to assess the situation before he started blasting away. I understand that legally an individual's emotional and mental state can lead to diminished responsibility (obviously if you think your wife is being raped, you're certainly in a heightened emotional state), but it just seems as though this ruling comes much, much to close to promoting the ideology of "shoot first, ask questions later."

I am a proponent of the right to bear arms but I strongly feel that with the right to own and use a gun for self-defense and protection comes the responsibility to use the weapon like you're not an 8-year old. If the alleged rapist gets out of the truck and charges you with a knife, by all means defend yourself. If the alleged rapist tries to flee the scene in his truck try to get a clear look at his face, get the license plate/make/model, make sure your wife is okay, and call the police for #$%&s sake.
--Mith

I would rather be ashes than dust! I would rather that my spark should burn out in a brilliant blaze than it should be stifled by dry rot. I would rather be a superb meteor, every atom of me in magnificent glow, than a sleepy and permanent planet. The proper function of man is to live, not to exist. I shall not waste my days in trying to prolong them. I shall use my time.
Jack London
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Controversial grand jury decision - by Mithrandir - 04-03-2007, 12:11 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Doc - 04-03-2007, 12:45 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Nystul - 04-03-2007, 01:11 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by --Pete - 04-03-2007, 01:32 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Mithrandir - 04-03-2007, 02:24 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by DeeBye - 04-03-2007, 03:50 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Jester - 04-03-2007, 06:30 PM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Lissa - 04-03-2007, 06:40 PM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Doc - 04-04-2007, 02:17 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Nystul - 04-04-2007, 09:14 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by wundergore - 04-05-2007, 02:28 PM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Jester - 04-05-2007, 10:51 PM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Doc - 04-06-2007, 03:50 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Gregorius - 04-06-2007, 04:05 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by kandrathe - 04-06-2007, 05:12 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Chaerophon - 04-06-2007, 09:21 PM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Malakar - 04-07-2007, 05:34 PM
Controversial grand jury decision - by eppie - 04-09-2007, 09:12 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Nystul - 04-09-2007, 09:53 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by eppie - 04-09-2007, 05:10 PM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Tris - 04-10-2007, 04:09 AM
Controversial grand jury decision - by Nystul - 04-12-2007, 02:44 PM
Controversial grand jury decision - by eppie - 04-12-2007, 03:06 PM
Controversial grand jury decision - by -Magi - 04-15-2007, 08:10 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)