This entire article is hilarious

[Archon_Wing]

I know a large number of people who dont accept homosexuality.

In fact most of America didnt until the 90s and that was thanks to a large efort led mostly by the media.
So I suppose you would be ok with beastiality if we talked it about it a lot for 30 years  and eventually the majority became comfortable with it going on out of sight?
[right][snapback]86071[/snapback][/right]

That's a good point, Ghostiger.

Indeed, many people don't accept homosexuality, which is why homosexuality was illegal and there are still many legal issues surrounding it.

Regarding the beastilaity issue, yes, I personally would never accept it, but if we were actualy headed in such a direction, I think there would be other issues at stake here.

But you are probaly right about one flaw in my post... leaving it up to mob rule probaly isn't the best idea. I still say that we still have thousands of years of moral and philiosophical thinking to base decisons on. I daresay society has had a good reason to frown on such behaviors such as rape and beastiality.

Perhaps it's wrong for me to not view "right" and "wrong" as some kind of supernatural thing that it's out there and is self-evident. I thought of it more of society's way of saying "Don't push that or you'll kill us all" kind of thing. It's why I dislike people who always argue morality is subjective or absolute. They usually end up with reasoning (it's just wrong, it could be wrong but...) which leaves the rules (the law) vague and covering situations they never intended to cover. I know that each situation is diffrent, but without a clear law backed with strong reasoning, well... we're just left arguing all the time which is ok for discussions such as this but not in a court of law.


This is probaly not a sastifactory response for you, let me think about it and try to give me more input while I try to get my brain running.