09-28-2005, 09:22 PM
whathuh,Sep 28 2005, 10:38 AM Wrote:I also feel this thread has gone crazy with sub-par games. I meant games that were simply AWESOME for their time. While d2 was an awesome game for me, diablo was so much better. D2 was simply a remake of d1 with a whole lot more options, but the classes were still not balanced. Doesn't change the fact that it's still an addictive game, but not one of my "greatests".
[right][snapback]90406[/snapback][/right]
Which games are "awsome" will depend on the person, so while there may be a lot of, to you, "sub-par" games, we all won't agree. To some people, civilization three is a major improvement on civilization two, but I think of three as a step down, played it a little, and lost interest.
I may be dead, but I'm not old (source: see lavcat)
The gloves come off, I'm playing hardball. It's fourth and 15 and you're looking at a full-court press. (Frank Drebin in The Naked Gun)
Some people in forums do the next best thing to listening to themselves talk, writing and reading what they write (source, my brother)
The gloves come off, I'm playing hardball. It's fourth and 15 and you're looking at a full-court press. (Frank Drebin in The Naked Gun)
Some people in forums do the next best thing to listening to themselves talk, writing and reading what they write (source, my brother)