This sounds like a great idea!

[Lissa]

Hmm, then please tell me as to how I was able to copy/paste this just now: "Canada passed a law Thursday making it illegal to use the wrong gender" into Google search and get several pages of this headline from various different sites? I'm into page 3 and it's still going and going and going.... Fake interwebs?

Also, you can look up Bill C-16. Fake law, I know.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1vkExyp1vA

Once again you show your bigotry and don't recognize what the passed law was about. I did your little search and the only link in the first three pages that wasn't related to the bigotry you're extolling came from Time which explains what it's all about (hint, it's not illegal to use a wrong gender pronoun, it's illegal to discriminate on gender or gender expression and judges need to consider if hate/bias of gender or gender expression was involved in crimes).

http://time.com/4821022/justin-trudeau-c...on-gender/

So, as Deebye rightly stated, you're trolling once again.

For the sake of argument, do you think that bigotry, be it imaginary or real, as long as it's just verbal, should result in jail time?

Nah. Cause then when you get out, you'll just do it again.

Getting your face smashed into the concrete though, might make you think twice about doing it again.

You mean, like this?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/15/politics/c...index.html

Tsk, tsk, your true colors are coming through, interwebs tough guy.

Oh and Lissa, I'm waiting for your answer, although I already know that it will be something like blah, blah, blah.... racist, homophobe, fascist. You know, the factual arguments that liberals pride themselves on so much.... oh, wai....

Why should I answer a question when it's obvious you're twisting it around. The point is Intent. If you couldn't figure out what was required, then:

1) You're obviously trying to just twist things for your own biased opinion.

2) You're too daft to understand what "Intent" means (even with the resources available on the internet from dictionary.com and websters.com).

3) Trolling as usual.

Likewise, you still don't get that this law is an anti-discrimination law, the same as you see in the US involving non-gender aspects (like race, creed, religion), it's just that Canada went the extra step and added gender into their anti-discrimination laws. But given your bigoted attitude, you would never see it this way.