The Iraq War retrospective Thread

[Vandiablo]

They actually probably prefer democrats, because they tend to put their head in the sand and ignore the problem allowing the terrorists to flourish

I already assumed you'd say it, so no surprise there. And you didn't even need a new attack.

(e.g. like under Mr. Clinton's watch).

Bush II was happy to not do anything, until 9/11.

If you really want to go down that road -- which I think is stupidity -- there's this: Reagan gave more to the terrorists by withdrawing Marines after their barracks were bombed. The Great Appeaser. So nyah.

I think you are mistaken if you think the U.S. did nothing in 1992 to 2000.

In fact, if Mr. Obama gets elected, I'm sure we'll be too busy passing "global warming abatement" legislation to worry about border security or international terrorism.

For one who chides others for their loyalty to dogma, you're pretty good at it yourself.