Hi,
How dare you yell at me, I'm Old enough to be your OLDER BROTHER by at least 1 year :P
Sorry for any confusion...the Not Under-Aged I was referring to are the CHILDREN from Birth to 13 years of Age. Since 14 to 17 years of age seems to be the Taget age in this case.
FACT: Of the 463 children, 250 are girls and 213 are boys. Children 13 and younger are about evenly split -- 197 girls and 196 boys -- but there are only 17 boys aged 14 to 17 compared with the 53 girls in that age range.
How dare you yell at me, I'm Old enough to be your OLDER BROTHER by at least 1 year :P
Quote:IF THEY AREN'T UNDER-AGED, THEY AREN'T CHILDREN. DAMNIT!
--Pete
Sorry for any confusion...the Not Under-Aged I was referring to are the CHILDREN from Birth to 13 years of Age. Since 14 to 17 years of age seems to be the Taget age in this case.
FACT: Of the 463 children, 250 are girls and 213 are boys. Children 13 and younger are about evenly split -- 197 girls and 196 boys -- but there are only 17 boys aged 14 to 17 compared with the 53 girls in that age range.
Quote:Jim Said:
In regards to the Children that are Not Underaged things seem to get complicated in this Case.
I'm no expert in these matters so I can Not offer anything but an Opinion. I do believe that anyday we will learn the Boys in this case were also sexually abused, this is a perfect set-up for Pedophile's [An adult who is sexually attracted to a child or children.]
________________
Have a Great Quest,
Jim...aka King Jim
He can do more for Others, Who has done most with Himself.
Have a Great Quest,
Jim...aka King Jim
He can do more for Others, Who has done most with Himself.