A Freebie Worthy of Deebye

[LemmingofGlory]

Easy.  The first time, I was being sarcastic and that did not come across. (you are not alone, see above.)  The second time, you missed the joke.  You have now replied to two jokes in a serious tone.

*shrug* So what was the joke? (The meaning, not the words.)

Concept behind the joke on "Vegan erotica."  Association is that Vegans would be more prone to use wheat for erotic purposes since it is a vegetable, rather than an item made of meat, dairy, or plastic.  Shopping list idea joke: a non Vegan considers trying this previously unexplored erotic device, finding it new and novel.

I used "vegetation erotica" instead of "Vegan erotica" because "Vegan erotica" could be taken to mean "erotica involving Vegans" (rather than "erotica for Vegans"), which is a whole 'nother melon. "Vegetation erotica" keeps with your idea of people being attracted to vegetation. The change in wording was merely semantic.

This vegetable theme brings to mind an old daffynition, that of a woodpecker being a mahogany dildo.  But I digress.

A wooden woody? Sounds splintery.

On a less cynical note, are we mixing basic attractiveness with fetishes in this liine of inquiry?  Are we crossing the fine line between attraction and arousal?

Good point, and that may well be another weakness of that definition of fetish: it's not addressing the right process. As I said, I didn't find it wholly useful, just interesting.

Luckily, since we aren't in Kurast, I doubt anyone will get hurt by any fetishes, although there is the risk of blunt trauma injury should one of the ladies walking about the docks turns quickly as we pass by.  Did you get that one?  Or did you duck?

The "... although there is risk" clause is less amusing than the Fetish/fetish joke and effectively kills it. No injury here, just death.

-Lemmy