Socialized Health Care in the USA

[weakwarrior]

I read Carlin's brief. He is not so much trying to debunk "Global Warming", as he is asking the EPA to consider that the IPCC, and other reports may be based on one sided thinking. His point is that the EPA is the environmental action arm of the US government. He lists a number of valid omissions and possible omissions to the peer reviewed work that has been published. Really, he is asking that before the EPA jumps on the popular band wagon enforcing environmental legislation (which will harm people economically) that they protect the EPA's reputation by insuring the science is unbiased. The alternative would be litigation by those people harmed, who will bring lawsuits against the US government where the government has no defense. When it comes to impartiality, justice (usually) is blind, politics chooses the winning side, and scientists are supporters of their own theories.

I´m sorry but the argument that since we don´t know everything we don´t know anything (or at least we can´t do anything based on the knowledge we have) - which is pretty much the synopsis of his work as best I can tell - is a faulty one very popular among people who don´t want to accept scientific concensuses (is that the plural?). I ask that you show where the second link I posted is wrong in tearing him to shreds. Every time I try and continue this post it turns into a rant so I´ll stop here.