The Lurker Lounge Forums › The Lurker Lounge › The Lounge v
Sony Cell

Thread Modes
Sony Cell
Yrrek Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 465
Threads: 46
Joined: Feb 2003
#1
02-09-2005, 10:02 PM
Cell


Check this out. New super-processor for all you other nerds to drool at! :)
WWBBD?
Website Find
Reply
Quark Offline
New Custom User Title
*****
Posts: 2,161
Threads: 100
Joined: Feb 2003
#2
02-09-2005, 10:54 PM
Yrrek,Feb 9 2005, 05:02 PM Wrote:Cell
Check this out. New super-processor for all you other nerds to drool at!  :)
[right][snapback]67716[/snapback][/right]

I find the ongoing coverage by Ars Technica is the best, if you don't mind going too in depth.
Trade yourself in for the perfect one. No one needs to know that you feel you've been ruined!
Find
Reply
Yrrek Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 465
Threads: 46
Joined: Feb 2003
#3
02-09-2005, 11:43 PM
Quark,Feb 9 2005, 05:54 PM Wrote:I find the ongoing coverage by Ars Technica is the best, if you don't mind going too in depth.
[right][snapback]67719[/snapback][/right]

I like your article better. Thanks!
WWBBD?
Website Find
Reply
whyBish Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 957
Threads: 21
Joined: Feb 2003
#4
02-11-2005, 10:32 AM
I've read both articles, but something is not clear to me. I understand the architecture side of things, but can't see how it delivers the exponential scaling claimed. I thought it was a 'fundamental law' that processors would scale less than linearly (each processor added requires an additional number of cycles dedicated to coordination activities).
Any hints?
Website Find
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)