06-18-2012, 06:19 PM
Does anyone else think it's wrong that the behavior of this logic is wrong (not the individual points, but as a whole):
1) Attack speed is too good, so we need to change the modifiers, and make it retroactive.
2) Legendaries are not that good, so we need to change the modifiers, but we can't make it retroactive.
Now, I understand that point 1) is just a matter of changing the ASI table in the MPQ, and that they can't do that with Legendaries. Legendaries share common affixes with other items, and going forward they will change *something* to make them better. If they changed the affixes, it would mess up every item that has that affix, regardless of rarity class.
Most of the readers here know that also, but to the common player, do you think that this could lead to a backlash?
1) Attack speed is too good, so we need to change the modifiers, and make it retroactive.
2) Legendaries are not that good, so we need to change the modifiers, but we can't make it retroactive.
Now, I understand that point 1) is just a matter of changing the ASI table in the MPQ, and that they can't do that with Legendaries. Legendaries share common affixes with other items, and going forward they will change *something* to make them better. If they changed the affixes, it would mess up every item that has that affix, regardless of rarity class.
Most of the readers here know that also, but to the common player, do you think that this could lead to a backlash?